Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Rev. nefrol. diál. traspl ; 35(2): 69-74, jun. 2015.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-908373

ABSTRACT

Introducción: algunos autores sostienen que los pacientes >65 años dificultan a la DP como una opción dialítica. Objetivos: Analizar la efectividad dialítica en >65 años tratados en DP. Material y métodos: Se estudiaron desde 1/2011 a 1/2015, 27 pacientes >65 años. 19 varones y 8 mujeres, edad 74,6 años (65-87), tiempo en DP 42,9 (5-55) meses. 14 DPCA y 13 DPA. Se analizaron indicadores clínicos, tasa de peritonitis, ôdrop-outõ total por peritonitis y por muerte, requerimiento de cuidador y calidad de vida. Resultados: Requirieron de cuidador 9(33%). Tuvieron peritonitis 13 (48%), 7 solo un episodio que no causó morbilidad y 6 salieron de DP por peritonitis. Episodios de peritonitis 1/50 mp. Salieron 11 pacientes (40,7%), 4 por peritonitis. Murieron 2 pacientes de peritonitis, 4 fueron transferidos a HD y 1 recuperó la función renal. Los indicadores clínicos: Kt/v> 1,7, 85% y 78%; P plasmático 8,5 mg/dl 87%, Hb> 10 g/dl 81%PTH entre 150 y 400 pg/ml 67% y albúmina plasmática >3,5 g/dl 78% para ambas terapias. Sobrevida de la técnica: 62%, 55%, 40%, y 25%, a 12, 24, 36 y 48 meses respectivamente. Se observó mayor tiempo de entrenamiento, menor destreza, más infecciones respiratorias y complicaciones cardiovasculares. Conclusiones: Los "pacientes de la tercera edad" obligan a un tratamiento multidisciplinario. La DP es una terapia con ventajas en pacientes con enfermedad cardiovascular y dificultades para lograr un acceso vascular. Las complicaciones asociadas a la DP no son diferentes respecto a los pacientes más jóvenes.


Introduction: some authors say that patients over 65 years of age reject PD as a dialytic option. Objetives: To analyze dialytic effectiveness in patients >=65 years old on PD. Material and Methods: From 1/2011 to 1/2015, 27 patients over 65 years were studied. 19 males and 8 females, age 74.6 years (65-87), period of time on PD : 42.9 (5-55) months. 14 CAPD and 13 APD. Clinical indicators, peritonitis rate, total dropout because of peritonitis and death, nursing requirements and quality of life. Results: 9 (33%) required nursing. 13 had peritonitis (48%), 7 had only one episode that did not cause morbility and 6 dropped out from PD due to peritonitis. Peritonitis episodes 1/50 mp. 11 patients dropped out (40.7%), 4 because of peritonitis. 2 patients died due to peritonitis, 4 were transferred to HD and 1 recovered renal function. Clinical indicators: Kt/v>=1.7, 85% and 78%; Serum P p= 8.5 mg/dl 87%, HB= 3.5 g/dl 78% for both therapies. Technique survival: 62%, 55%, 40%, and 25% in 12, 24, 36 and 48 months respectively. Longer training time, lesser skill, more respiratory infections and cardiovascular complications were observed. Conclusions: ?Third age patients? demand a multidisciplinary treatment. PD is an advantageous therapy in patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases and difficulties to achieve a vascular access. Complications associated to PD do not differ from those applied to younger patients.


Subject(s)
Male , Female , Humans , Aged , Effectiveness , Peritoneal Dialysis , Renal Dialysis , Peritonitis , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL